Clinton's "Creative" Campaign Tactics
I always thought that people in campaign ads had given their permission for the use of their image and that it was fairly recent footage. I was wrong.
Last night I was watching the news and saw a promo for a story that really shocked me. It said that one of the people in the now famous 3:00 am commercial by the Clinton campaign was actually an Obama supporter who was shocked to see herself in the commercial. I left the room for two minutes and of course I missed the story. I had to find out more, so I just did a Google search and found this story on King5.com.
I was wrong to think that the people who appeared in a campaign ad were usually at some sort of campaign event for the person. Apparently not. The Clinton campaign used footage owned by Getty Images. The kids sleeping were obviously not at a campaign event, but I at least thought that they were filmed for this ad specifically.
I wonder how widespread this practice is for campaign commercials to contain stock footage? It seems that there should be some sort of rule about this. The use of stock footage in a campaign ad seems different to me than if it used in a regular commercial for a product or service. Although that seems a bit misleading as well. I usually assume that film used in all commercials was shot specifically for that use.
How many advertisements in general contain unwilling participants? Sure they probably signed an agreement that had some fine print saying that any extra footage from the commercial or whatever they were in may become stock footage and used for other purposes, but do people really understand this? If someone really needs money and does a cereal commercial, do they really think that their picture will wind up years later in an ad promoting nuclear energy? Probably not. But, I digress.
Here's an excerpt from the news story.
"I've been campaigning for Barack Obama for a few months now," she said. "I was actually a precinct captain at the caucuses a few months ago. I attended his rally a few months ago and I'm a very, very avid supporter."
There's a related story on the Huffington Post that is quite interesting as well.
Well, the Clinton campaign did plant a student to ask certain questions at a campaign event a few months ago. Remember this story from November? I guess I shouldn't be surprised about anything that her campaign does at this point.
Anali's First Amendment © 2006-2008. All rights reserved.
This Post's Link
Last night I was watching the news and saw a promo for a story that really shocked me. It said that one of the people in the now famous 3:00 am commercial by the Clinton campaign was actually an Obama supporter who was shocked to see herself in the commercial. I left the room for two minutes and of course I missed the story. I had to find out more, so I just did a Google search and found this story on King5.com.
I was wrong to think that the people who appeared in a campaign ad were usually at some sort of campaign event for the person. Apparently not. The Clinton campaign used footage owned by Getty Images. The kids sleeping were obviously not at a campaign event, but I at least thought that they were filmed for this ad specifically.
I wonder how widespread this practice is for campaign commercials to contain stock footage? It seems that there should be some sort of rule about this. The use of stock footage in a campaign ad seems different to me than if it used in a regular commercial for a product or service. Although that seems a bit misleading as well. I usually assume that film used in all commercials was shot specifically for that use.
How many advertisements in general contain unwilling participants? Sure they probably signed an agreement that had some fine print saying that any extra footage from the commercial or whatever they were in may become stock footage and used for other purposes, but do people really understand this? If someone really needs money and does a cereal commercial, do they really think that their picture will wind up years later in an ad promoting nuclear energy? Probably not. But, I digress.
Here's an excerpt from the news story.
The first girl in the ad is young Casey Knowles. It's stock footage from eight years ago when she worked as a TV extra - footage owned now by Getty Images and used by the Clinton campaign.
But they couldn't have picked a more unwilling star.
"It's really sort of ironic that my image would be used to advocate for Hillary when I myself do not," said Casey.
She may only be 17, but Casey has some very strong political opinions. She turns 18 - legal voting age - in April, in plenty of time before the general election.
"It's perfect timing because I have a candidate that I really identify with," she said.
"I've been campaigning for Barack Obama for a few months now," she said. "I was actually a precinct captain at the caucuses a few months ago. I attended his rally a few months ago and I'm a very, very avid supporter."
There's a related story on the Huffington Post that is quite interesting as well.
Well, the Clinton campaign did plant a student to ask certain questions at a campaign event a few months ago. Remember this story from November? I guess I shouldn't be surprised about anything that her campaign does at this point.
Anali's First Amendment © 2006-2008. All rights reserved.
This Post's Link
Comments
Casey Knowles is on record--and on television--offering to appear in a counter-ad for the Obama campaign. So far, they've not taken her up on the offer.
This kind of stuff happens all the time. A song written by one of the former members of the group Boston was used by one of the Republican candidates, Huckabee. The songwriter is a firm Democrat. McCain stopped using a Mellencamp song.
Campaigns are like a whole other world. And when they're over, everyone makes nice again. The great thing about Obama is, he's tried to stay above the fray all along. Sadly, it makes him look as if he's not a fighter in other arenas, too.
Like.. what's that? The idea of making every single song on every album sound just about the same? That's the only thing Boston stands for that I can think of.
Now, if someone had taken my segments and re-cut them to say something totally different, maybe that would be comparable to what you're citing. It is an interesting little abnormality.
I guess it's a common practice but it's kind of screwed up when you become a 'face' in something you don't want to be involved with. Look it could be worse.. she could have found herself in a Mc Cain commercial. haha.
Crazy but true.
dmarks - Welcome! That was a pretty amusing story. Candidates have to be careful which songs they choose. I think that I heard that Hillary Clinton chose a Celine Dion song for her campaign. I guess for about five minutes there was flack that she chose a Canadian artist over an American one. And I'm sure the Republicans will keep trying to find dirt on Obama. If they can't find anything, they'll just make something up.
zen chef - LOL! Good thing you don't have to track those down! : )
tera - This fighting between Democrats is certainly not helping the party.